Criminal Law
Criminal Law
​Alexander v. State (Ind. Ct. App. May 10, 2013) In this case, the Indiana Court of Appeals dismissed a criminal appeal on the grounds that the Court of Appeals lacked jurisdiction because the order that the Defendant was attempting to appeal was not a final order.
Read More arrow right
Medical Malpractice Complaint Filed with the Indiana Department of Insurance
Medical Malpractice Complaint Filed with the Indiana Department of Insurance
In this medical malpractice case, the Indiana Court of Appeals decided, as an issue of first impression, that a proposed complaint for medical malpractice is not considered filed with the Indiana Department of Insurance on the day it is mailed if it sent by a third-party private carrier.
Read More arrow right
Family Law: Contribution to Child's College Education
Family Law: Contribution to Child's College Education
​Lovold v. Ellis (Ind. Ct. App. April 26, 2013) In this decision, the Indiana Court of Appeals addressed several issues, including the often-litigated and disputed obligation of a non-custodial parent to contribute to the cost of a child’s college education.
Read More arrow right
Products Liability Case Providing Analysis of Personal Jurisdiction
Products Liability Case Providing Analysis of Personal Jurisdiction
​Sebring v. Air Equipment & Engineering, Inc. (April 4, 2013) In this products liability case, the Court of Appeals gave a comprehensive analysis of personal jurisdiction.
Read More arrow right
Employment Law
Employment Law
​Walczak v. Labor Works – Fort Wayne, LLC (Ind. March 13, 2013) In this decision, the Supreme Court addressed some uncertainty that existed regarding the Wage Payment Act and the Wage Claims Act.
Read More arrow right
Family Law: Grandparents' Rights
Family Law: Grandparents' Rights
In re Visitation of M.L.B. (Ind. March 7, 2013) In this opinion, the Supreme Court addressed the tension that often arises between grandparents’ rights to see their grandchildren and parents’ rights regarding their children.
Read More arrow right
Subject Matter Jurisdiction to Hear Labor Disputes
Subject Matter Jurisdiction to Hear Labor Disputes
​Walczak v. Labor Works-Fort Wayne, LLC (Ind. Ct. App. March 5, 2012) This case involved a claim for unpaid wages filed by an employee against a temp agency.
Read More arrow right
Family Law: Turner v. Turner
Family Law: Turner v. Turner
​Turner v. Turner (Ind. Ct. App. Feb. 28, 2013) On July 1, 2012, the legislature amended Indiana Code § 31-16-6-6 by changing the presumptive age for termination of child support from twenty-one to nineteen. In this case, the Court of Appeals addressed the effect of the amended statute on child support orders entered before the amendment.
Read More arrow right
Premises Liability
Premises Liability
South Shore Baseball, LLC v. DeJesus (Ind. Ct. App. Feb. 15, 2013) The Indiana Court of Appeals has issued a decision that significantly affect claims involving injuries to spectators at baseball games or other sporting events.
Read More arrow right
Restitution: Iltzsch v. State (Ind. Jan. 24, 2013)
Restitution: Iltzsch v. State (Ind. Jan. 24, 2013)
​Iltzsch v. State (Ind. Jan. 24, 2013) In this opinion, the Supreme Court reached two conclusions regarding restitution proceedings.
Read More arrow right
Appeals in the News- early January
Appeals in the News- early January
It has been a busy start to 2013 for appeals in the news.
Read More arrow right
Tort Prejudgment Interest Statutes
Tort Prejudgment Interest Statutes
On December 12, 2012, the Supreme Court handed down four decisions interpreting the Tort Prejudgment Interest Statutes (TPIS), Kosarko v. Padula; Inman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company; Alsheik v. Guerrero; and Wisner v. Laney.
Read More arrow right
Child Custody
Child Custody
​D.C. v. J.A.C. (Ind. Nov. 13, 2012) In this child-custody dispute, the Indiana Supreme Court affirmed the trial court’s decision to modify custody in favor of the father and prevent the mother from moving out of state with the child.
Read More arrow right
Worker's Compensation Law: Amerisafe Risk Services, Inc. v. Estate of Wadsack
Worker's Compensation Law: Amerisafe Risk Services, Inc. v. Estate of Wadsack
​Amerisafe Risk Services, Inc. v. Estate of Wadsack (Ind. Ct. App. Nov. 9, 2012) In this case, the Court of Appeals held that a party bringing against a worker’s compensation insurer and claims handler must first bring the claim before the Worker’s Compensation Board before proceeding in state court.
Read More arrow right
Appellate Procedure
Appellate Procedure
State v. Holtsclaw (Ind. November 5, 2012) In this case, the Indiana Supreme Court held that Appellate Rule 9, which tolls the thirty-day deadline for filing a notice of appeal when a party files a motion to correct error, applies not only in civil cases but also to the State in a criminal case.
Read More arrow right
Protective Orders
Protective Orders
​A.G. v. P.G. (Ind. Ct. App. Sept. 21, 2012) In this case, the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s extension of a protective order issued against a father in favor of a mother.
Read More arrow right
Criminal Procedure- Search and Seizure
Criminal Procedure- Search and Seizure
​Carpenter v. State (Ind. Ct. App. Sept. 19, 2012) In this case the Court of Appeals affirmed the defendant’s conviction for Class B felony conspiracy to commit dealing in methamphetamine.
Read More arrow right
Underinsured Motorist Insurance and Subrogation Rights
Underinsured Motorist Insurance and Subrogation Rights
​State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Kern (Ind. Ct. App. Sept. 20, 2012) The Court of Appeals issued an important decision regarding underinsured motorist insurance and subrogation rights.
Read More arrow right
Medical Malpractice
Medical Malpractice
This medical malpractice case involves an important issue of law not previously explicitly addressed by Indiana Courts: whether a plaintiff may pursue a claim against a principal based on an apparent agency relationship where the party did not sue the agent and the statute of limitations against the agent has run.
Read More arrow right
Applicability of res ipsa loquitur to Medical Malpractice Cases
Applicability of res ipsa loquitur to Medical Malpractice Cases
Smith v. Dermatology Associates of Fort Wayne, P.C.(Ind. Ct. App. Sept. 7, 2012) In this case, the Court of Appeals discussed the applicability of res ipsa loquitur to medical malpractice cases.
Read More arrow right
Barrett McNagny LLP

Legal Disclaimer

The information contained in the Barrett McNagny LLP website is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice on any subject matter. Furthermore, the information contained on our website may not reflect the most current legal developments. You should not act upon this information without consulting legal counsel.

Your transmission and receipt of information on the Barrett McNagny LLP website, or sending an e-mail to one of our attorneys or staff, will not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Barrett McNagny LLP. If you need legal advice and want to establish an attorney-client relationship with Barrett McNagny LLP, please contact one of our attorneys by telephone, email, or other means of communication, and allow the attorney to confirm that the firm does not represent other persons or entities involved in the matter and that the firm is willing to accept representation. Until such confirmation is provided by one of our attorneys, you should not transmit information to us that you consider confidential. If you do provide information to us, and no attorney-client relationship is established, the information will not be considered confidential or privileged, and our receipt of such information will not preclude us from representing another client in a matter adverse to you.

Any links to other websites are not intended to be referrals or endorsements of those sites.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

ADA Compliance

Transparency Cover Rule: Machine-Readable Files

Contact Us
Hello,
My name is
 
and I am a(n)
seeking legal counsel in the area of 
.
Please
me at
as soon as you can.

Thank you for contacting us!

A representative will be in touch with you shortly.

An attorney-client relationship will NOT be formed merely by sending an email to Barrett McNagny, LLP or to any of its attorneys. Please do not send any information specific to your legal needs until you obtain approval from a Barrett McNagny, LLP attorney, as the content of such email will not be considered confidential or privileged. By sending us an email, you confirm your understanding of this notification. If you agree, you may use the e-mail links on this page to contact an attorney. By providing your mobile number, you consent to receive text messages from Barrett McNagny regarding your case and related services. Please note that standard message and data rates may apply.
YesNo