Parties often litigate the issue of whether a person was a resident of another’s home for purposes of an insurance policy. This case involved a declaratory judgment action brought by an insurer to determine whether it had a duty to provide coverage to a son who lived in his mother’s household. The mother had specifically told the insurer that there were no residents of her household over the age of 14. Therefore, if the son was a "resident" under the terms of the insurance policy, there was no coverage; if the son was not a "resident," there was coverage because he was driving his mother’s car with her permission.
The Court went through the factors identified by Indiana Farmers Mutual Insurance Company v. Imel, 817 N.E.2d 299 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004) and found a question of fact as to the son’s residence. This issue is often a question of fact, but can be decided as a matter of law, as evidenced by the Court of Appeals’ recent decision in Quiring v. GEICO General Insurance Co., 953 N.E.2d 119 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011), which, somewhat curiously, the Poage court did not cite.
The court also held, in footnote 3, that by paying the related property damage claim the insurer had not waived the issue of whether the son was covered. The court also found the insurer did not waive the coverage issue by writing a letter stating that there was a question as to coverage and that the insurer would do everything it could to settle the claim within policy limits. These holdings are extremely important for insurance defense counsel.
The information contained in the Barrett McNagny LLP website is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice on any subject matter. Furthermore, the information contained on our website may not reflect the most current legal developments. You should not act upon this information without consulting legal counsel.
Your transmission and receipt of information on the Barrett McNagny LLP website, or sending an e-mail to one of our attorneys or staff, will not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Barrett McNagny LLP. If you need legal advice and want to establish an attorney-client relationship with Barrett McNagny LLP, please contact one of our attorneys by telephone, email, or other means of communication, and allow the attorney to confirm that the firm does not represent other persons or entities involved in the matter and that the firm is willing to accept representation. Until such confirmation is provided by one of our attorneys, you should not transmit information to us that you consider confidential. If you do provide information to us, and no attorney-client relationship is established, the information will not be considered confidential or privileged, and our receipt of such information will not preclude us from representing another client in a matter adverse to you.
Any links to other websites are not intended to be referrals or endorsements of those sites.
An attorney-client relationship will NOT be formed merely by sending an email to Barrett McNagny, LLP or to any of its attorneys. Please do not send any information specific to your legal needs until you obtain approval from a Barrett McNagny, LLP attorney, as the content of such email will not be considered confidential or privileged. By sending us an email, you confirm your understanding of this notification. If you agree, you may use the e-mail links on this page to contact an attorney.