This case involved a claim for unpaid wages filed by an employee against a temp agency. The determinative issue was whether the employee’s action fell under the Wage Payment statute, which applies to current employees and employees who voluntarily leave employment, or the Wage Claims Statute, which applies to employees who were involuntarily separated from employment. The Court did not reach the employee’s argument that the Wage Claim Statute applies only where an employee was fired or where the employee’s work was suspended due to a labor dispute, as the Court concluded that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. Specifically, the Court found the claim involved factual issues that should have been resolved by the Department of Labor. Thus, the Court reversed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to the temp agency and remanded with instructions to dismiss the employee’s complaint.
This case demonstrates the importance of subject matter jurisdiction. From the text of the opinion, it appears that although Labor Works had raised the issue below, neither the parties nor the trial court focused on the issue. The Court of Appeals, however, found subject matter jurisdiction to be the dispositive issue and declined to address other potential issues. The Court also refused to affirm the grant of summary judgment in favor of the employer, as the trial court did not have jurisdiction to grant this relief. The takeaway here is that if a party has a subject matter jurisdiction argument, it is important to pursue it fully, as affirmative relief granted can be vacated if the subject matter jurisdiction argument would have been successful.
The information contained in the Barrett McNagny LLP website is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice on any subject matter. Furthermore, the information contained on our website may not reflect the most current legal developments. You should not act upon this information without consulting legal counsel.
Your transmission and receipt of information on the Barrett McNagny LLP website, or sending an e-mail to one of our attorneys or staff, will not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Barrett McNagny LLP. If you need legal advice and want to establish an attorney-client relationship with Barrett McNagny LLP, please contact one of our attorneys by telephone, email, or other means of communication, and allow the attorney to confirm that the firm does not represent other persons or entities involved in the matter and that the firm is willing to accept representation. Until such confirmation is provided by one of our attorneys, you should not transmit information to us that you consider confidential. If you do provide information to us, and no attorney-client relationship is established, the information will not be considered confidential or privileged, and our receipt of such information will not preclude us from representing another client in a matter adverse to you.
Any links to other websites are not intended to be referrals or endorsements of those sites.
A representative will be in touch with you shortly.
An attorney-client relationship will NOT be formed merely by sending an email to Barrett McNagny, LLP or to any of its attorneys. Please do not send any information specific to your legal needs until you obtain approval from a Barrett McNagny, LLP attorney, as the content of such email will not be considered confidential or privileged. By sending us an email, you confirm your understanding of this notification. If you agree, you may use the e-mail links on this page to contact an attorney.